Structuring Organizations: Overview
The Original «Levels of Work»
These discoveries were originally developed from observations of managerial roles and the behaviour of managers within large organizations. The hierarchy discovered by Elliot Jaques and Wilfred Brown was referred to regularly as «
».The Table below offers a summary of the material to be developed in this section. The attempt to be fully general means the language is perhaps slightly strained. Elaboration and examples in the Topics to follow should clarify matters.
Turf disputes associated with Jaques's heritage have bedevilled the field for many years. Labels and specifications of levels have sparked particular controversy: see discussion of alternatives.
L | Responsibility Label | Need to be Met | Response to be Made |
---|---|---|---|
WL7 | Total Coverage |
Determination of organizational identity. |
|
WL6 | Multi-field Coverage | Policy formulation and control | |
WL5 | Field Coverage |
Strategy design and implementation | |
WL4 | Comprehensive Provision | Management control of developments | |
WL3 | Systematic Provision | Operational control of concrete systems | |
WL2 | Situational Response | Resolution of open-ended concrete cases | |
WL-1 | Prescribed Output | Responses to concrete demands. |
A table comparing names for levels in this Framework to similar names for types in the and modes in is provided here, together with the link to
Organization Structure & Management of Work
- There are as shown in the above Table. These levels are about defining a within an organization.
- The central issue in designing structures and managing a large organization is: what full-time posts are needed at which levels.
Review the distinction between posts and roles.
- The specified for the top post is always the minimum required. The scope, complexity and potential social impact of the organization depends on this minimum. However, all organizations, even the smallest, should address the higher in regard to determining suitable values and goals.
- Choice of size is a function of activities that are viewed as unavoidable and those that are aspirational. The greater the aspiration for scope and impact, the more sophisticated the organisation required, and so the more full-time roles in higher levels needed.
More on size:
Describing the Work-Levels
The next topic offers a basic account of the nature of the output at each in terms of needs to be met and responses to be made. Examples are provided to illustrate characteristic level-specific tasks, jobs and organizations. The characteristic time-scales, deadlines for task completion, are identified. Common titles given to posts are noted.
-
The progressive contexts described in terms of planning, resource handling and information management.
can also be appreciated as -
Getting these contexts right is the basis for the strongest form of authority: line-management. However, the whole system only works properly if the nature of personal capability to carry responsibility is appreciated.
Following this exposition, a review is provided and various further implications and perspectives will be explored.
-
Start now with a basic description.
OR
- Return to the Guide for other options.
Originally posted: 10-Jan-2014